Monday, December 05, 2005

Distraction: Prbomles Slpileng?

Stolen from the one of the comments section of the Dilbert Blog:
Icdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid Aoccdrnig to rscheearch taem at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Such a cdonition is arppoiately cllaed Typoglycemia :)- Amzanig huh? Yaeh and yuo awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt.
I'm not sure if this means that all people are inherently brilliant, or if its an excuse to be a lazy speller. Maybe both.

reading is fundamental ling lingI've been looking for an excuse to use this picture.
This sorta qualifies.


<-Back to the Main Page